Sustainable energy storage systems could replace lithium-ion batteries

Source: stock.adobe.com – Negro Elkha

With growing concerns in the EU about China’s influence in the renewable energy sector, leaders are being cautioned against becoming overly dependent on Chinese lithium-ion batteries. As the EU aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, it will increasingly rely on volatile renewable energy sources, significantly raising the demand for energy storage capacities.

The Group of Seven (G7) major industrial nations now plan to increase global electricity storage capacity by 6.5 times by 2030, according to a draft joint declaration by their energy ministers to promote renewable energy. Policymakers, industry leaders, and scientists face the challenge of successfully implementing this initiative.

A stable energy supply must be guaranteed at all times. Europe is expanding wind and solar parks, yet there is a lack of grid capacity to transport the electricity to where it is needed. Negative electricity prices arise in situations where the supply of electricity from renewable energies significantly exceeds the demand. Large-scale storage systems can shift the availability of electricity from periods of surplus to periods of shortage, thereby avoiding curtailment, especially of wind farms.

Lithium-ion batteries have long been considered the market-leading energy storage technology due to their high energy density. However, they are more performance-oriented than long-term capacity storage. Typically, lithium-ion batteries cannot store energy for much longer than eight hours. The future renewable energy system will be subject to significant fluctuations. No single storage technology can meet all needs alone. Therefore, a mix of technologies is required, with long-duration energy storage (LDES) gaining importance.

Long-term energy storage is gaining in importance

According to BloombergNEF, lithium-ion batteries will lose their market leadership in energy storage to newer technologies, some of which are already price-competitive. The average investment costs for thermal energy storage and compressed air energy storage are $232/kWh and $293/kWh, respectively. In contrast, lithium-ion batteries cost $304/kWh for systems with a runtime of four hours.

However, BloombergNEF notes that the costs for long-duration energy storage (LDES) are unlikely to decrease as rapidly as the costs for lithium-ion batteries this decade. This is because lithium-ion batteries are widely used in both the transportation and energy sectors, and these scaling effects will drive down the technology’s costs.

In Europe, long-duration energy storage (LDES) has better competitive chances for various reasons. These include cost considerations as well as issues of energy security. There is a focus on technologies that do not rely on lithium and China. Additionally, lithium is not inherently sustainable. When considering the entire value chain, the methods for extracting and processing lithium have significant ecological and social impacts. Furthermore, lithium batteries can occasionally ignite. Safety concerns are one reason why large energy providers are looking for energy storage systems that can operate for decades without the risk of a “dangerous event”.

Public net electricity generation in August 2023

www.enery-charts.info/, Fraunhofer IPT – Volative power generation from renewable energies

A significant expansion of electricity storage could significantly reduce the investment pressure on expensive gas power plants and provide substantial added value for climate protection and the economy if the regulatory framework is right. This is demonstrated by a study commissioned by the companies BayWa r.e., ECO STOR, enspired, Fluence, and Kyon Energy at Frontier Economics. The main reasons are clear. They lie in saving fossil gas and avoiding CO2 and the corresponding CO2 costs. Additionally, there are marketing opportunities for storage and the provision of system services. With energy storage, existing grids can be better utilized, and future grid expansion can be significantly reduced.

In fact, Germany should have long since invested in pumped storage power plants. However, not a single new one has been connected to the grid since 2003. Pumped storage and hydrogen storage are well-suited for storing energy over very long periods, but they require an enormous amount of time and cost-intensive expansion. There are other long-duration energy storage (LDES) technologies such as thermal energy storage, compressed air energy storage, and redox flow batteries. While we are still in the early stages of commercialization with LDES technologies, China is already developing gigawatt-hour-scale projects, thanks to favorable political conditions.

New technologies based on pumped storage plants

New, sustainable approaches driven by startups worldwide are interesting. These durable systems operate without fossil fuels and chemicals and are relatively flexible in site selection.

The further development and testing of these sustainable storage concepts will be crucial to optimize the technologies and increase their market acceptance. The benefits of these systems are clear: if they work, they could surpass lithium-ion batteries in many applications. The German government is increasingly focusing on gas power plants and hydrogen as energy storage solutions.

It remains to be seen which energy storage technologies will ultimately prevail.

Doris Höflich, Market Intelligence Senior Expert

Sources: